The Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) has an ANOM case before it in which the foreign court order behind the evidence was obtained by misleading a judge in Vilnius. What the Lithuanian documents mean for the interstate principle of trust, Article 6 ECHR and ANOM defendants across Europe.

Seven Joint Defense Team lawyers on EncroChat, SkyECC and ANOM: why mutual trust cannot replace judicial review of cross-border digital evidence in Europe.

Verified documents from the FBI's Project Trojan Shield show that the courts asked to authorise the ANOM data collection were deliberately deceived about the platform's true origin and operator, a finding that affects ANOM prosecutions across numerous countries.

A cross-jurisdictional analysis of the rapidly evolving case law on SkyECC, EncroChat and ANOM evidence. Courts across Europe and beyond are increasingly scrutinising mass interception, evidentiary integrity and fair trial guarantees. With key proceedings pending before the ECtHR and CJEU, the legal foundations of encrypted evidence are facing a decisive global reckoning.

The ECtHR has communicated new SkyECC cases from Norway, raising fundamental questions on fair trial rights under Article 6 ECHR. Together with Silgir v Germany (EncroChat) and ongoing ANOM proceedings, the Court is shaping a European framework for the use of encrypted communication evidence in cross-border criminal cases.

Christian Lödden reveals the ANOM leaks: How FBI and Lithuanian police misled judges – hundreds of convictions in Germany and Europe now at risk.

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung published a report about ANOM and the revelations of our member Christian Lödden.